click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
TORTS CH 5
Question | Answer |
---|---|
The defendant's actions are the nearest cause of the plaintiff's injuries. | proximate cause |
The capacity for a party to reasonably anticipate a future event. | foreseeability |
A legal standard that is based on conduct and perceptions external to a particular person. | objective standard |
Understanding gained by actual experience. | knowledge |
Such a degree of care, precaution or diligence as may fairly and properly be expected or required, having regard to the nature of the action, or of the subject matter, and the circumstances surrounding the transaction. | duty of care |
The improper performance of some act that a person may lawfully do. | misfeasance |
The omission of an act that a person ought to do. | nonfeasance |
An assumption made especially in order to test its logical or empirical consequences. | hypothesis |
Doctrine in which it is assumed that a person's injuries were caused by the negligent act of another person as the harmful act ordinarily would not occur but for negligence. | res ipsa loquitur |
Arriving at a conclusion based on evidence. | inference |
Results from statutes establishing that certain actions or omissions are impermissible under any and all circumstances | negligence per se |
The failure to use reasonable care to avoid harm to another person or to do that which a reasonable person might do in similar cicumstances. | negligence per se |
A rule of law, statutory or judicial, by which finding of a basic fact gives rise to existence of presumed fact, until the presumption is rebutted. | presumption |
The defeat, refute, or take away the effect of something. | rebut |
The intentional failure to perform a manifest duty in reckless disregard of the consequences as affecting the life or property of another. | gross negligence |