click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
JC Act III rhetoric
These are the rhetorical devices/fallacies used in Act III of Julius Caesar
Rhetorical Device | Definition |
---|---|
Glittering Generalities Fallacy | To associate your own argument with words and ideas that are positive even though those words are not necessarily part of the argument |
Name Calling Fallacy | To associate your opponent's argument with words or ideas which are negative even though those ideas were not necessarily part of the opponent's argument |
Ad hominem Fallacy | To attack the other person rather than their argument |
Inconsistency Fallacy | To make an extended argument in which one claim within that argument contradicts another claim or the argument itself |
Ethical Appeals | When a speaker calls upon their personal character and experiences to add validity to their argument |
Emotional Appeals | Arguments in which the speaker uses words to stir up emotions in the audience |
Logical Appeals | Arguments in which the speaker uses sound reasoning, evidence, and proof to prove their point. |
Compare/Contrast | To set two ideas next to each other to show their similarities and differences |
Either/Or Fallacy | To present a situation as if there were only two possible outcomes…"either this or that…" |
Questionable Premise Fallacy | To present a false argument in the form of a question which partially implies that it is true |
Repetition | To use repeated words, phrases, or ideas for different rhetorical purposes |
Verbal Irony | When the speaker says one thing but means the opposite |
Use of props | Using different objects and things for different rhetorical purposes. EX: Caesar's will, the wounds on Caesar's Body |
Closing Statement/ Call to Action | Usually meant to be the most powerful or emotionally stirring end to a speech/rhetorical device. Usually includes a Call to Action. |