Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Criminal Law 2

Chapter 9 &10

TermDefinition
Born-alive rule The rule that to be a person, and therefore a homicide victim, a baby had to be “born alive” and capable of breathing and maintaining a heartbeat on its own.
Feticide The crime of killing a fetus.
Murder killing a person with “malice aforethought.”
Manslaughter killing a person without malice aforethought.
Justifiable homicide killing in self-defense.
Excusable homicide killings done by someone “not of sound memory and discretion.”
Criminal homicide all homicides that are neither justified nor excused.
Malice aforethought originally the mental state of intentional killing, with some amount of spite, hate, or bad will, planned in advance of the killing.
Depraved heart murder extremely reckless killings.
Intent to cause serious bodily injury murder no intent to kill is required when a victim dies following acts triggered by the intent to inflict serious bodily injury short of death.
Serious bodily injury bodily injury that involves a substantial risk of death; protracted unconsciousness; extreme physical pain; protracted or obvious disfigurement; or protracted loss or substantial impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ or mental faculty.
“Express” malice aforethought the mental element of killings that fit the original meaning of “murder”—intentional killings planned in advance.
“Implied” malice aforethought the mental element of intentional killings without premeditation or reasonable provocation; unintentional killings during the commission of felonies; depraved heart killings; and intent to inflict grievous bodily harm killings.
Murder Actus Reu the act of killing by poisoning, striking, starving, drowning, and a thousand other forms by which human nature can be overcome
Murder Mens Rea can include purposeful, knowing, or reckless as the mental element in killing.
First-degree murder the only crime today in which the death penalty can be imposed, consisting of (1) premeditated, deliberate intent to kill murders and (2) felony murders.
Capital cases death penalty cases in death penalty states and “mandatory life sentence without parole” cases in non–death penalty states
Bifurcation procedure the requirement that the death penalty decision be made in two phases: a trial to determine guilt and a second separate proceeding, after a finding of guilt, to consider the aggravating factors for, and mitigating factors against, capital punishment.
Deadly weapon doctrine one who intentionally uses a deadly weapon on another human being and thereby kills him is presumed to have formed the intent to kill.
Second-degree murders murders that aren’t first-degree murders, including intentional murders that weren’t premeditated or deliberate, felony murders, intent to inflict serious bodily injury murders, and depraved heart murders.
Felony murder rule derives unintentional deaths that occur during the commission of some felonies are murders.
Manslaughter an ancient common law crime created by judges, not by legislators, consisting of two crimes: voluntarily or involuntarily killing another person.
Voluntary manslaughter suddenly and intentionally killing another person in the heat of anger following adequate provocation; elements include murder actus reus, mens rea, causation, and death.
Adequate provocation the requirement that the provocation for killing in anger has to be something the law recognizes, the defendant himself had to be provoked, and that a reasonable person would have been provoked.
Objective test of cooling-off time requires that a reasonable person under the same circumstances would have had time to cool off.
“Words can never provoke” rule the rule that words are never adequate provocation to reduce murder to manslaughter.
“Last-straw” rule also called the “long smoldering” or “slow burn” rule defines adequate provocation as “a smoldering resentment or pent-up rage resulting from earlier insults or humiliating events culminating in a triggering event that, by itself, might be insufficient to provoke the deadly act.”
Extreme mental or emotional disturbance manslaughter homicide committed under the influence of extreme mental/emotional disturbance for which there is reasonable explanation/excuse. The reasonableness of such explanation or excuse shall be determined from the viewpoint of the person in the actors situation.
Paramour rule the common law rule that a husband who caught his wife in the act of adultery had adequate provocation to kill; today, it applies to both parties of a marriage.
Gay panic adequate provocation based on “the theory that a person with latent homosexual tendencies will have an extreme and uncontrollably violent reaction when confronted with a homosexual proposition
Emotion–act distinction separating the emotions that led to a killing from the question of whether the killing itself was reasonable
Act reasonableness meaning “a finding that a reasonable person in the defendant’s shoes would have responded as violently as the defendant did.”
Emotional reasonableness a finding that “the defendant’s emotional outrage or passion was reasonable.”
Involuntary manslaughter an unintentional killing (mens rea) by a voluntary act or omission (actus reus).
Criminal negligence manslaughter death caused by a person who is aware that her acts create a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death or serious bodily injury, but acts anyway.
Unlawful act manslaughter or misdemeanor manslaughter unintended deaths occurring during the commission of nonhomicide offenses.
Malum prohibitum crime death has to be a foreseeable consequence of the unlawful act; the act is unlawful only because it’s prohibited by a specific statute or ordinance.
Euthanasia helping another person to die.
Presumption of bodily integrity a state can’t exercise power over individual members of society except to prevent harm to others.
Common law rape intentional, forced, non- consensual, heterosexual vaginal penetration between a man and a woman not his wife.
Common law sodomy anal intercourse between two males.
Carnal knowledge vaginal sexual intercourse.
Aggravated rape rape by strangers or individuals with weapons who physically injure their victims.
Unarmed acquaintance rape nonconsensual sex between individuals who are known to one another.
“Assumption of risk” approach to rape case view of rape cases that holds the victim accountable for their manner of dress, sexual history, amount of resistance to the attack, and other behaviors deemed socially unacceptable.
Criminal sexual conduct statutes comprehensive statutes that replaced the single crime of rape with a series of graded offenses, eliminated the resistance and corroboration requirements, restricted the use of evidence regarding the victim’s sexual history, and removed the marital rape.
Corroboration requirement an element in rape that the prosecution had to prove rape by the testimony of witnesses other than the victim.
Rape shield laws statutes that prohibit introducing evidence of victims’ past sexual conduct.
Marital rape exception provided that husbands could not legally rape their wives.
Force and resistance rule provided that victims had to prove to the courts that they didn’t consent to rape by demonstrating that they resisted the force of the rapist.
Utmost resistance standard requirement that rape victims had to use all the physical strength they had to prevent penetration.
Reasonable resistance rule provides that the amount of force required to repel rapists shows nonconsent in rape prosecutions.
Extrinsic force in rape cases, requires some physical effort in addition to the amount needed to accomplish the penetration.
Cultural cognition how group values influence individuals’ perceptions of facts.
Threat-of-force requirement requires the prosecution to prove that the victim experienced both subjective and objective fear in rapes involving threats of force.
Subjective fear means that the victim honestly feared imminent and serious bodily harm.
Objective fear means that the fear was reasonable under the circumstances.
Honest and reasonable mistake rule a negligence mental element in rape cases in which the defendant argues that he honestly, but mistakenly, believed the victim consented to sex.
Statutory rape to have carnal knowledge of a person under the age of consent whether or not accomplished by force.
Defense of reasonable mistake of age a defense to statutory rape in California and Alaska if the defendant reasonably believed his victim was at or over the age of consent.
Battery unwanted and unjustified offensive touching.
Assault an attempt to commit battery or intentionally putting another in fear.
Attempted battery assault having the specific intent to commit battery and taking substantial steps toward carrying it out without actually completing the battery.
Threatened battery assault intentional scaring requiring only that actors intend to frighten their victims, thus expanding assault beyond attempted battery.
Conditional threats threats that are not immediate but based upon the existence of certain conditions that don’t presently exist.
Stalking intentionally scaring another person by following, tormenting, or harassing.
Cyberstalking the use of the Internet, email, or other electronic communication devices to stalk another person through threatening behavior.
Right of locomotion the right to come and go without restraint.
Kidnapping the taking and carrying away of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of personal liberty.
Asportation the act of carrying away or physically moving a victim of kidnapping.
Kidnapping mens rea the mental element of kidnapping requiring the specific intent to confine, significantly restrain, or hold victims in secret.
False imprisonment depriving others of their personal liberty without the asportation requirement.
Created by: Meli272004
Popular Law sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards