click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Contract - Formation
Formation (offer/acc/consid/part payment)
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Gibson v Man City Council | Offers must have definite terms unlike the letter (ITT) |
Pharmaceutical Society v Boots Cash Chemists | Goods in a self-service shop are an ITT |
Partridge v Crittenden | Advertisements are usually an ITT |
Fisher v Bell | Goods on display in a shop window are an ITT |
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. | Acceptance of a unilateral offer is through performance |
Barry v Heathcote Ball | Implied (collateral) contract between auctioneer and bidder |
Harvey v Facey | A request for information and reply isn't an offer |
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking | At a machine, acceptance is through inserting money. |
Routledge v Grant | Revocation of an offer (with comm) can be made at any time |
Hyde v Wrench | Once an offer is rejected (CO) it cannot be accepted (farm) |
Dickinson v Dodds | Communication of revocation needn't be by the offeror |
Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore | Offers lapse after end of fixed/reasonable time |
Stevenson v McLean | Exact timing of offer and acceptance are critical in deciding when a contract comes into existence |
Felthouse v Bindley | Acceptance cannot be made through silence |
Reveille Independent v Anotech International | A directory method of acceptance by a particular method does not have to be complied with (mastechef) |
Adams v Lindsell | If posting rules apply, acceptance takes place at the moment of posting |
Entores v Miles Far East | With non-postal acceptance, it occurs when offeror is aware of acceptance. Lord Denning quote - ravine |
Thomas v BPE Solicitors | Email acceptance valid once available to be recieved e.g., work hours |
Thomas v Thomas | Payment of small rent deemed consideration |
Chappell v Nestle | Consideration must be sufficient - wrappers amounted to consideration |
Re McArdle | Past consideration has no value (bungalow inheritence) |
Roscorla v Thomas | no consideration in second promise for the horse to be free from vice. |
Re Casey's Patent | There is an expectation of payment for the patent work - good consideration |
Lampleight v Braithwait | There is an expectation of payment for getting a pardon - good consideration |
Pao On v Lau Yiu Long | outlines exceptions to Re McArdle. Action done @ promisors request. Expectation of payment. if made at time, would contract be enforceable. |
Tweddle v Atkinson | agreement between dad and father in law to pay son. dad dies. Son unable to enforce contract - no contract with father in law |
White v Bluett | not complaining isn't good consideration - not anything of value |
Ward v Byham | keeping daughter happy is deemed good consideration - above and beyond legal requirement |
Collins v Godefroy | Witness has a public duty to give evidence so doesn't do anything extra so not good consideration |
Glasbrook v Glamorgan CC | Despite having a public duty, sending extra police to the coal strike is good consideration |
Stilk v Myrik | two of the crew desert. Existing contractual duty to get the ship back to safety - not above and beyond - not good consideration |
Hartley v Ponsonby | Half of the crew desert. Crew must go above and beyond their existing contractual duty - good consideration |
Williams v Roffey | obviating a disbenefit (avoiding penalty clause) is good consideration and so is the benefit of not employing another |
Pinnel's Case | a promise to accept part payment of a debt in return for forgoing the balance is not binding - bare promise |
Byrne v Van Tienhoven | postal rule doesn't apply for revocation - applies upon arrival |
Foakes v Beer | House of Lords affirmed rule in Pinnels case |
What are the exceptions to the part payment rule? | Goods offered, early payment, Different place of payment |