Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Inchohates - Crim
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What is an Inchohate Offense? | allow punishment of an actor even though he has not completed the object crime |
| Why do we punish for Inchohates? | • Allow earlier police intervention. • Bad people either way (No better or worse mentally than criminal) |
| What is a complete attempt? | actor carries out the full act but is unsuccessful in producing the intended result (shooting and missing) |
| What is an incomplete attempt? | actor carries out some of the acts that she set out to do, but then desists or is prevented from continuing by an extraneous factor (police intervention) |
| Can you be punished for both an attempt to complete a crime and the complete act? | NO: merger rule |
| How does common law punish attempts? | punishes at lower level than completed offense |
| How does MPC punish attempts? | punishes at same level as completed offense, unless first degree |
| Mens Rea: Attempt (CL) | specific intent • conduct that constitutes attempt must be intentional. • intent to commit the completed offense, while engaged in conducting the attempt. • beyond a reasonable doubt. • Can’t attempt to commit a reckless or negligent offense. |
| Mens Rea: Attempt Generally (MPC) | Purpose or Belief |
| Mens Rea: Attempt Result Crime, complete attempt (MPC) | A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if when causing a particular result is an element of the crime, does or omits to do anything with the purpose of causing or with the belief that it will cause such result without further conduct |
| Mens Rea: Attempt Conduct Crime, complete attempt (MPC) | A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if he purposely engages in conduct that would constitute the crime if the attendant circumstances were as he believes them to be |
| Mens Rea: Attempt, incomplete attempt (MPC) | A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if he purposely does or omits to do anything which he believes to be a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime. |
| Actus Reus: Attempt (MPC) | Substantial step that strongly corroborates criminal purpose without negativing the sufficiency of other conduct. |
| Actus Reus: Attempt (CL) | Physical Proximity Dangerous Proximity Unequivocally 'res ipsa' Last Act Indispensible Element Probable Desistence Abnormal Step Test (PUPILAD) |
| Actus Reus: Attempt; Physical Proximity (CL) | the overt act required for an attempt must be proximate to the completed crime, or directly tending toward the completion of the crime, or must amount to the commencement of the consummation. |
| Actus Reus: Attempt Dangerous Proximity (CL) | A D can only be convicted of an attempted crime if intentionally engage in act that not only tends towards the commission of the crime but is so close to accomplishment that, but for interference, the crime would likely have been committed. (rizzo) |
| Actus Reus: Attempt Unequivocally 'res ipsa' (CL) | an attempt is committed when actor’s conduct manifests intent to commit a crime. The D conduct must pass point where most men would think better of their conduct, and desist. • You can see the intent by just looking at it. |
| Actus Reus: Attempt Last Act (CL) | whether an attempt has occurred, at least by the time a person has performed all the acts believed to be necessary to commit the target offense. (Peaslee) |
| Actus Reus: Attempt Indispensable Element (CL) | a variation of the proximity tests which emphasizes any indispensable aspect of the criminal endeavor over which the actor has not yet acquired control. |
| Actus Reus: Attempt Probable Desistence (CL) | the conduct constitutes an attempt if, in the ordinary and natural course of events, without interruption from an outside source, it will result in the crime intended. • “Gotten so far you couldn’t back out.” |
| Actus Reus: Attempt Abnormal Step (CL) | (only one widely different from above tests) • The ordinary person would have thought better. • Only test that doesn’t look at what’s remaining, but what you’ve done already. |
| Actus Resu: Attempt: CL v. MPC | MPC looks at what’s been done already, whereas common law looks at what’s remaining. MPC allows authorities to step in sooner. |
| Factual/ Hybrid Legal Impossibility? MPC | Not Recognized as a Defense |
| Pure Legal Impossibility? MPC | Recognized as a Defense |
| Factual/Hybrid Legal Impossibility? CL | not a defense to a charge of attempt D intended end constitutes a crime, but fails to complete it because of a factual circumstance unknown to her or beyond her control. • Ex. D receives unstolen property under belief it is stolen. |
| Pure Legal Impossibility? CL | will bar an attempt conviction. • applies when an actor engages in conduct that he believes is criminal but is not actually prohibited by law. ex. Intends to have intercourse with 16 year old thinking legal age is 17. Legal age is 16. |
| Abandonment Defense? MPC | When actor's conduct would otherwise constitute an attempt, it is an affirmative defense that he abandoned effort to commit crime or prevented its commission, under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of his criminal purpose. |
| Abandonment Generally | voluntary abandonment: not defense where attempt elements already established, although relevant to whether D possessed the requisite intent in first place. - once D has committed a punishable attempt, the crime is “complete”, and he can't abandon crime |
| Abandonment Defense? CL | Recognized: A defendant can't be charged with attempt if they voluntary abandon the act before attempting it, while still in a position of contemplating the breach. (McCloskey) |
| Simple Assault (MPC) | Guilty of Simple Assault if: - attempts or purpose/know/reckless causes bodily harm to another; - negligently causes bodily injury to another with deadly weapon; or - attempts to put one in fear of imminent ser. bodily harm. (misdemeanor) |
| Aggravated Assault (MPC) | Guilty of Aggravated Assault if: - purposely/knowingly/recklessly manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life (2nd deg. felony); or - attempts to cause/purposely/knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon. (3rd deg) |
| Assault (CL) | Unlawful attempt, coupled with present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another. |
| Solicitation Actus Reus (MPC) | • Command, encourage, or request a third party to: • commit a crime or • attempt to commit a crime or • to be an accomplice • More thorough than common law |
| Solicitation Acus Reus (CL) | indictable as a misdemeanor inviting, requesting, commanding, hiring, or encouraging [different verbs for request] another to commit a particular offense. |
| Solicitation Mens Rea (MPC) | purpose of promoting or facilitating commission Recognizes attempt of solicitation: • Immaterial whether they received/communicated the solicitation; still guilty. • only requires intent to communicate for solicitation. |
| Solicitation Mens Rea (CL) | Dual intent (specific intent) • the intent to perform the acts constituting the solicitation and, • the specific intent that the other person commits the solicited offense. |
| Solicitation Renunciation of Criminal Purpose (MPC) | • Complete and voluntary renunciation AND • Persuade/prevent other party from committing. |
| Solicitation CL v. MPC | • Both recognize same merger rule, both capped at charge in the 2nd degree • MPC counts being an accomplice as solicitation (CL does not) |
| Solicitation Generally | - (Attempted conspiracy) - Asking, enticing, inducing, counselling of another to commit a crime. - Solicitor conceives a criminal idea and furthers commission via another person - Can be guilty even if crime is not committed. |
| Conspiracy Generally | • A mutual agreement or understanding, express or implied, between two or more persons to commit a criminal act OR to accomplish a legal act by unlawful means. • generally responsible for all acts committed by co-consp. (agreement) even if did not know. |
| Conspiracy Purpose for Punishing | • Earlier intervention allowed because no overt act needed. • Extraordinary danger presented by multi-member criminal undertakings. |
| Conspiracy Mens Rea (MPC) | • With the purpose of promoting or facilitating the criminal act’s commission • Knowledge or belief is not enough. |
| Conspiracy Mens Rea (CL) | Specific Intent • the intent to agree, or conspire, and • the intent to commit the offense. • Conspiracy doesn’t merge. • Can't conspire to commit unintentional crime. • Must have > one person with the same specific intent (meeting of the minds) |
| Conspiracy Actus Reus (MPC) | • Agreement to: • Commit, attempt, or solicit 3rd to commit target crime. • Aid in planning, commission, attempt, or solicitation of the crime Overt Act • required for conspiracy to commit lower felonies, not for 1st/2nd felonies |
| Conspiracy Actus Reus (CL) | Agreement • Some states also require an overt act. Pinkerton Requirements Typically conspiracy & accomplice overlap; extreme cases: Pinkerton (co-conspirator, not accomplice) Cook (accomplice, not co-conspirator) you can be one and not the other. |
| Conspiracy - How Is Intent Established? (MPC) | Intent established by • Knowledge of the illegal use of goods/services and • Intent to further that use. Intent can be shown by • direct evidence; • special interest in crime; or • the aggravated nature of the crime. |
| When does Conspiracy Terminate? (MPC) | the crime is committed or, agreement is abandoned by the defendant and coconspirators. abandonment if • no overt act happens in execution of the conspiracy; and • conspirator advises coconspirators of his abandonment. |
| Accomplice liability ≠ Conspiratorial Liability | • Can be accomplice without being a co-conspirator. • Entering agreement NOT the same as participating • The agreement that preexists the actual commission of the crime is essential to the offense of conspiracy. |
| Conpiracy - Pinkerton Requirments (CL) | • the substantive offense committed by conspirator must be • done in furtherance of the conspiracy, AND • Must fall in scope of unlawful project, AND • Must be reasonably foreseeable as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement. |
| Merger Rule Solicitation | Merges into conspiracy, attempt, and the completed crime (under CL & MPC §5.05(3)) • Merges once there is an agreement w/ requisite mental state turns into conspiracy. • Cannot be convicted of both solicitation and one of the above |
| Conspiracy- Reuninciation Requirements (MPC) | • Actor must thwart success of conspiracy (stop harm) • Must be complete and voluntary renunciation of criminal purpose. |
| Conpiracy - Merger Rule (MPC) | Merges into completed crime unless: • Ongoing conspiracy - involves the commission of additional offenses not yet committed or attempted. |
| Conspiracy MPC v. CL | • Common law doesn’t merge conspiracy, MPC does sometimes. • Common law requires bilateral, MPC requires unilateral. |
| Conspiracy - What Type of Agreement is Necessary? (MPC) | Unilateral: requires only one person's actual intent to conspire |
| Conspiracy - What Type of Agreement is Necessary? (CL) | Bilateral: requires actual intent between 2 or more people to conspire - Under the bilateral theory of conspiracy, to be convicted of conspiracy, there must be an actual agreement between two or more individuals to perform an illegal act. (Foster) |
| Accomplice Liability Generally | • Not a substantive crime; it’s just a tool. • Not strict liability; but derivative liability • Causation doesn’t matter (don’t have to be a “but for” cause) |
| Accomplice Liability (MPC) Accomplice if: | • with purpose of promoting/facilitating commission of offense solicits or aids/agrees/attempts to aid in planning/committing it; or has legal duty to prevent commission & fails, AND • conduct expressly declared by law to establish his complicity. |
| Accomplice Liability (MPC) Knowledge? | Knowledege/Belief not enough |
| Accomplice Liability (CL) | Specific Intent One is liable as accomplice to crime if he: - gave assistance or encouragement or failed to perform a legal duty to prevent it. - with the intent thereby to promote or facilitate commission of the crime Actual assistance or omission |
| Accomplice Liability (CL) Knowledge? | Knowledge is enough if D has intent to further the criminal enterprise. Shown by • Direct evidence • Defendants special interest in the crime; or • The aggravated nature of the crime |
| Accomplice Liability (CL v. MPC) | • MPC only needs attempt to aid. • MPC knowledge/belief not enough |
| Accomplice Liability: Unintented Results (MPC) | Responsible for unintended results if one • Is an accomplice in the conduct causing the result and, • acts with the mens rea required for the offense. |
| Accomplice Liability: Unintended Results (CL) | (majority)Responsible for unintended results if • Intent to assist and • Mens rea for the crime (charged offense) • Majority rule under CL is same as MPC. (minority) Not responsible |
| Accomplice Liability: Unplanned Crimes (MPC) | Not responsible for unplanned crimes perpetrated by a partner. |
| Accomplice Liability: Unplanned Crimes (CL) | Responsible for unplanned crimes perpetrated by a partner if the natural and probable consequences doctrine applies. (reasonably foreseeable – negligence only requirement for mens rea) |
| Accomplice Liability: Derivative Liability/Strict Liability | • SL: primary: negligent; accomplice: automatically negligent • DL: primary: negligent; accomplice depends; negligently, reckless, knowingly, or purposely. • Accomplice can be charged with a higher-level crime than the primary actor |
Created by:
hollymurphy8
Popular Law sets