click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Tort Law - VL
Vicarious Liability
Question | Answer |
---|---|
What is Vicarious Liability? | When employers are liable for the torts of their employees (Strict Liability) |
What are the public policy reasons for imposing liability on employers? | Employer more likely to have means of paying comp, ensures they are held accountable for their employees |
What is test for VL? | (1) Employee/Rel Akin to Employment (2) Close Connection test (3) Salmond Test |
What is the Salmond Test? | (1) tort must be a wrongful act authorised by employer or (2) wrongful and unauthorised mode of doing something authorised by employer |
What is meant by the term, 'going on a frolic of their own'? | no close connection between what they were doing and what they were employed to do |
Limpus v London Omnibus Co | Bus driver caused accident from driving - closely connected to employment |
Beard v London Omnibus Co | Bus conductor caused accident from driving - not closely connected to employment |
Rose v Plenty | 13-year old injured working for milkman - liable. Scarman: "Principle of VL is one of public policy" |
Hilton v Thomas Burton | Employee was on a 'frolic of his own' when returning van so not liable |
Lister v Helsey Hall | Employer (school) liable for employing sexually abusive warden |
Mohamud v Morrison | Racially abusive petrol station cashier - liable - merely bad way of doing what he's employed to do |
Bellman v Northampton Recruitment (not essential) | Nature of discussions alike work-meeting so close connection - liable |
Morrisons v Various Claimants | Persuing personal vendetta (publishing private info) so no close connection - not liable |
Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions | Test to determine if you are an employee: (1) Economic reality test (2) Control Test |
Barclays Bank v Various Claimants | Doctor is an independant contractor not employee - not liable |
Christian Brothers Case | Abusive religious teachers in 'relationship akin to employment' with institute - liable |
Armes v Nottinghamshire CC | Abusive foster parents in 'relationship akin to employment' with council - liable |
Cox v Ministry of Justice | 'relationship aking to employment' between prisoners working in kitchen and Ministry of Justice so liable |
Eval? |