click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law - Invol
Involuntary Manslaughter: Constructive Manslaughter
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Test for constructive manslaughter | (1) Unlawful Act (2) That is dangerous (3) That causes the death of V |
Franklin | unlawful act can't be a tort |
Lowe | unlawful act can't be an omission |
Lamb | no unlawful act (no assault) |
Bristow and Others | unlawful act was a burglary + some crimes may become dangerous under alternate circumstnaces? |
Farnon and Ellis | unlawful act can be criminal damage |
Church | Outlines dangerous act test |
Dangerous act test | A reasonable person must foresee the possibility of SOME harm |
DPP v Newbury and Jones | children didn't foresee possibility of harm, but because the test is objective, they were liable |
JM and SM | dangerous act test merely requires the foreseeability of some harm (bouncer chase + thin skull rule for aneurysm) |
Larkin | unlawful act needn't be directed aty V |
Dawson | Reasonable person doesn't foresee harm (heart attack) |
Watson | Reasonable person does foresee harm (burgling of known old person) |
Lewis | no break in the chain of causation, so liable for constructive ms |
Kennedy | Injecting of heroin that D supplied breaks chain of causation, so not liable for constructive ms |
mens rea of constructive manslaughter | mens rea of the unlawful act |