click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law eval
Evaluation of the non-fatal offences against the person
Question | Answer |
---|---|
disadvantages of the current non-fatal offences | archaic terminology, illogical structure and sentencing, offences not classed in order of seriousness, lack of correspondence |
advantages of the current non-fatal offences | uses case law, overlap in sentencing, lack of correspondence allows ease of conviction |
how is the current law on non-fatals outdated? | words like assault, malicious, grievous, battery can be misleading to jury, OAPA 1861 - CAN LEAD TO WRONG VERDICT |
sentences for the non-fatal offences | Ass/Bat - 6m, ABH/GBHs20 - 5 years, GBHs18 - life |
what crimes is there a lack of correspondence? | ABH/GBH s20 |
what are some ideas for reform? | law com draft bill amended 2015: Threatening, physical and aggravated assault, and clauses 1, 2, and 3 |
clause 1 | AR: causing serious injury MR: intent max sentence: life |
clause 2 | AR: causing serious injury MR: recklessness max sentence: 7 years |
clause 3 | AR: causing injury MR: intent/recklessness max sentence: 5 years |
aggravated assault | AR: physical/threatening assault causing injury MR: ? intent/recklessness as to p/t assault? max: 12 months |
physical assault | AR: inflicting violence MR: ?intent/recklessness? max: 6 months? |
threatening assault | AR: causing apprehension of immediate personal violence MR: intent/recklessness? max: 6 months? |
what are the objectives/advantages of implementing the law commissions proposal? | better structure/sentencing, offences classed in hierarchy for seriousness, modern terminology, correspondence |