Human Resource Management
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equal Employment Opportunity | show 🗑
|
||||
show | -Fairness issues
-Economic disparity
-Changing material values
-Interest group agendas
-Political party mandates
-Loop-holes in current legislation
🗑
|
||||
show | -Passed by congress
-Passed by state legislature
-Presidential executive orders
*changes go through state court system or federal court system
🗑
|
||||
Legal Environment- Agencies | show 🗑
|
||||
Legal Environment- Regulatory Action | show 🗑
|
||||
Legal Environment- Management Responses | show 🗑
|
||||
show | -aimed at solving critical national issues, such as employment inequalities
-constituents are not business organizations, but political and social groups wanting to redress past social inequalities
🗑
|
||||
Equal Pay Act of 1963 | show 🗑
|
||||
Civil Rights Act (Title VII) 1964 | show 🗑
|
||||
Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) | show 🗑
|
||||
Business Necessity | show 🗑
|
||||
Sexual Orientation | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Prohibits discrimination with regard to increasing age, required benefit coverage for older workers, protects workers age 40-65.
**1978: raise mandatory retirement age to 70
***1986 no upper age limit
🗑
|
||||
Executive Order 11246 | show 🗑
|
||||
Pregnancy Discrimination Act (Amendment to CRA 1964) | show 🗑
|
||||
Americans with Disabilities Act | show 🗑
|
||||
show | 1. a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activites.
2. a record of such impairment
3. being regarded as having such an impairment.
*personality disorders are covered
**kleptomania,pyromania,substance a
🗑
|
||||
NOT a Disability | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Burden of proof (that discrimination did not occur) returned to employer. Punitive damages allowed for intentional discrimination.
🗑
|
||||
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act | show 🗑
|
||||
State of North Carolina | show 🗑
|
||||
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Proof of validity is established through validation studies that show the job relatedness or lack thereof for the selection instrument under study.
🗑
|
||||
show | Denotes evidence that – unless rebutted – would be sufficient to prove a particular proposition or fact
🗑
|
||||
show | Employer treats an applicant/employee differently because of his/her protected class status (i.e., different standards for different people)
🗑
|
||||
show | Employer applies the same standard to all applicants/employees, but the standard affects one group more negatively
🗑
|
||||
show | Hiring rate of protected class is less than 4/5 of the hiring rate of the majority group
🗑
|
||||
show | -job relatedness
-BFOQ
-Seniority system
-business necessity
🗑
|
||||
show | Company must show that its procedures are related to employee performance.
🗑
|
||||
Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Employment practices that result in unfair discrimination are permitted if the actions are part of a bona fide seniority system
e.g last hired, first fired stands in court.
🗑
|
||||
show | Employment practices resulting in unfair discrimination are permitted if the actions are essential to efficient and safe operation of the company
🗑
|
||||
Sexual Harassment (under Title VII) | show 🗑
|
||||
Quid Pro Quo Harassment | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Occurs when unwelcome sexual conduct “has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with job performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.”
🗑
|
||||
Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services (1998) | show 🗑
|
||||
health benefits to same-sex couples | show 🗑
|
||||
show | School could not set aside seats for minorities; consideration of race in admissions must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling interest in diversity
🗑
|
||||
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Diversity of student body is a compelling interest, but the University of Michigan undergraduate admissions policy was not narrowly tailored to meet that interest
🗑
|
||||
show | Court supported company’s voluntary affirmative action training program for minorities.
🗑
|
||||
Firefighter Local 1784 v. Stotts (1984) & Wyant v. Jackson Board of Education (1986): | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Preferential treatment based on AA goals permitted if non-minorities protected.
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
1087860217
Popular Management sets