Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or
show password
Forgot Password?
Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or
Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account. Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
edit
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

AICP PLanning Law 6

Planning History 1976 - 2002

QuestionAnswer
Village of Arlington Heights v Metro Development Corp (1977) Stated that there must be intent to cause discrimination in order for an ordinance to be a violation of the 14th Ammendment... Even if the result of the law is discriminatory in nature.
Oakwood at Madison v Township of Madison (1977) Established criteria for determining if an ordinance is exclusionary and criteria for rectifying an ordinances it is determined to be exclusionary.
Penn Central Transport Co v City of NY (1978) First ruling to uphold a preservation law. Reasons are 1) preservation is a general welfare concern 2) economic value of property remained even if some of the uses were restricted
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v LA County (1987) Upheld County's regulations about building in a flood prone area 1) legitimate public interest 2) did not deny all economic viability 3) set legitmate set of time to find solution
Nollan v California Coastal Comm'n Upheld a public interest in protecting beach access, but overturned beach right-of-way for a property develpment because it lacked a nexus with that interest. Court said other legislations (height limits, width restrictions, or fence prohibitions) OK.
Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) Uverturned ordinance which took right of owner to build on coastline even though the intent to protect the shoreline from erosion is state interest. Said that even when there is a noxius use, a government must pay for loss of economically viablility.
Dolan v City of Tigar (1994) Overturned PC requirement that women deed land to the city in flood plain as part of the expansion of her business as a taking. Rather than deed property the PC should have simply required the land to be left open.
San Jose Christian Colllege v City of Morgan Hill (2002) Stated that a law that prevented a rezoning of a hospital to a school even if it meant that a religious organization was prevented from expanding their school.
Created by: kathie_we
Popular U.S. History sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards