click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
PHILOSPHY
Texts and themes // arguments
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Phaedo: What is the nature and function of the soul? | The nature of the soul is 'to reason' -- according to Aristotle, is reliant on the body |
Phaedo: What is misology? Why is it dangerous? | A hatred of argumentation -- means philosophy has no meaning. Distrust of argumentation means that we, ourselves, are not sound arguers |
Bhagavad-Ghita & questions of King Milinda: What is a bundle-continuum | 5 "bundles" of: form, feeling, perception, mentality, and consciousness. They are constantly changing, and the collective makes a person. |
Aristotle and Aquinas: Hylomorphism | Physical objects are matter + form -- made of 3 parts nutritive, sensitive, and intellectual. |
Aristotle and Aquinas: Dualism | The combination of mind + body makes a lifeform. |
Aristotle and Aquinas: Is the soul destructible? | Aristotle -- soul destructible, mind exists without the body Aquinas -- Soul indestructible |
Searle: central claim of materialism | Everything that exists is material -- "I am a body." Nothing exists after death. |
Searle: the distinction between mental and physical | Mental processes are caused by physical. Analogy -- Macro (water), Micro (H20). The micro system are just details of the macro system. |
Searle: existence of consciousness, intentionality, subjectivity, and mental causation | C: "feels like" I: directed thought S: emotional mentality MC: Decision's impact |
Phaedo: (1) Opposites, (2) Recollection, (3) Affinity, and (4) Forms | 1. all things come from opposite (life from death) 2. part of nature for things to scatter. Natural for soul to remain unchanging, body to change 3. Learning is recollection -- recollection means soul must have existed before 4. something X, partakes. |
Aristotle and Aquinas: Aristotle’s reasons for thinking that body and soul are co-dependent | The form of something is what makes it itself. Therefore, after death- a soul cannot exist w/o the body. |
Aristotle and Aquinas: Aquinas’s reasoning that the souls of nutritive and sensitive depend on their material bodies, but intellectual do not depend on the human body | nutritive soul and sensitive souls give life and substance to plants/humans. an intellectual soul is made human by 'an act of God' and thus, can live outside of the body. |
Aristotle and Aquinas: Aquinas’s arguments that intellectual souls do not get destroyed when a person dies | was created by an 'act of god.' |
Searle: Argument for materialism (analogy) | Mind and body are balanced. Water is the body, H20 is the mind. Mind destroyed after death. |
Buddhism: Nagasena’s argument by analogy that a person is just a conventional designation | Nagasena and so on—is only a generally understood term, a designation in common use. King Milinda's chariot is just made up of objects. |