Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Working Memory

Lecture 10 & Baddeley Reading

QuestionAnswer
in 1880's Joseph Jacobs wanted to measure individual differences among mental capacities of pupils tested by presenting a string of numbers & subjects attempted to repeat them back verbatim & if correct the string was increased until errors were made
working memory the system(s) involved in the temporary storage on info in the performance of such cognitive skills as reasoning, learning, comprehension
concept of limited capacity lies at heart of empirical research on short-term & working memory
model of comprehension developed by Kitsch & van Dijk assumes comprehension capacity is limited by the assumption that working memory can hold only a limited number of propositions & varies by each individual
development of info processing approach to human cognition reflected in Broadbent's book Perception & communication & Neissers Cognitive Psychology
Broadbent suggested it is necessary to assume 2 kinds of memory short-term & long-term
in short term memory items are held in temporary buffer from which the memory trace would fade spontaneously unless retrieved by rehearsal
in long-term memory forgetting was assumed to occur as a result of mutual interference between long-term memory traces
Melton (1963) showed traditional short-term memory tasks were capable of reflecting long-term learning & short term was a weaker version of long-term memory & proposed that forgetting was the result of interference
Waugh & Norman (1965) highlighted the need to distinguish between a hypothetical short-term memory store (primary memory) & the experimental short-term memory paradigm assumed to reflect it. no reason to assume any given experimental paradigm is a pure measure of anything & short-term forgetting occurs because of limited capacity of STM
new sources of evidence for dichotomous view two-component tasks, acoustic & semantic encoding, neuropsychological evidence
two-component tasks certain experimental tasks have 1 brief & 1 durable components
recency effect is good recall of last seen heard items
recency effect can be disrupted by a distracting task
recall of earlier items is dependent on variables known to influence long-term learning rate of presentation, word frequency, imageability
recency effect is sensitive to delay
in two-component tasks earlier items are recalled from long-term memory & recent items from temporary short-term store
immediate memory from verbal materials suggests memory is based on sound of material not meaning
sequences that are similar in sound lead to poorer immediate serial recall than dissimilar sequences
long term serial learning of word lists tend to rely on meaning, disrupted by semantic similarity, unaffected by similarity of sound
Sachs (1967) required subjects to decide whether a sentence is an exact repetition of an earlier section of the passage changes to surface structure that maintained meaning detected only when tested immediately & semantic changes detected after substantial delays
Kintsch & Buschre (1969) demonstrated that earlier LTM component of task was sensitive to semantic coding & recency component was susceptible to similarity of sound
most powerful evidence for distinction between LTM & STM came from brain-damaged patients
in 1960s there was evidence for division of memory into 3 subsystems sensory which fed into short-term (primary) memory which fed into long-term memory
sensory memory is series of brief sensory buffers lasting for less than a second
Atkinson & Shiffrin model termed the modal model learning assumption that LTL involved turner from short-term story & the longer an item is in a short-term store the greater its probability of being learned although a series of experiments failed to find the relationship
Craig & Lockhart re-interpreted modal model into levels of processing which argues the probability of an item being remembered increases as it is processed at progressively deeper & more elaborate levels
work of Baddeley & Hitch led to the assumption of a specific model of working memory that concluded digit span & cognitive tasks load on a common working memory system
identification of subjects who are high/low in capacity can be used to understand the role of working memory in a range of important tasks but depends on a good measure of working memory capacity
most frequently used measure of working memory capacity developed by Daneman & Carpenter (1980) where working memory span is the largest # of sentences that can be processed & final words recalled & found a correlation of +/- 0.72 between WMS & prose comprehension
Baddeley & Hitch proposed a tripartite WM system that assumes an attention controller (central executive) aided by the visuo-spatial sketchpad & articulatory/phonological loop that are capable of actively maintaining particular kinds of info
visuo-spatial sketchpad holds/manipulates info about objects/locations
articulatory/phonological loop is a system capable of storing/manipulating speech-based info
digit span depends on the phonological loop
executive processes are required to maintain operation of phonological loop
as digit load increases then executive demand increases which has an impact on concurrent span on any task that demands WM capacity
patients with impaired short-term memory performance have a deficit in the phonological loop system but doesn't prevent use of central executive or visuo-spatial sketchpad which explains why there is no general cognitive impairment
what component is the most complex & least understood component of the WM model? the central executive
the central executive is associated with the process of reflecting on info from environment/episodic memory to create accurate mental model of the situation & use it to select appropriate action
model by Norman & Shallice developed to account for slips of action & disruption of attentional control in patients with damage to frontal lobes
the supervisory attentional system (SAS) operates by chancing probabilities of actions to allow existing schema to be overridden
slips of action explained on basis of triggering of inappropriate schema
patients with frontal lobe damage show a combination of distractibility illustrated by utilization behavior & preservation which occurs when subject has difficulty breaking away from a given pattern of responding
utilisation behavior is when patient will respond, often inappropriately, by manipulating any object that comes to hand
patients with frontal lobe damage have deficit in operation of supervisory attention system which leads to difficulty in attentional control of action
utilization behavior occurs because system is captured by any triggering stimulus that occurs in absence of long-term SAS control
automatisation is the more the task is practiced the less demand it it likely to place on the supervisory attentional system
the finding that the central executive operates the same way as the supervisory attentional system provided explanation for limited capacity for random generation
capacity to generate declines with age & is correlated with intelligence
the prime feature of the central executive is to coordinate info from a # of different sources
Logie showed that imagery could be disrupted by material with little spatial info
what is the strongest evidence for multi-component visuospatial sketchpad neuropsychological evidence
there are 2 subsystems underlying visual imagery 1. dependent on occipital lobes & involved in representing physical appearance of objects 2. dependent on parietal lobes & responsible for spatial info
PET scanning studies indicate involvement of what in visuospatial sketchpad occipital, parietal, pre-frontal & frontal lobes primarily in right hemisphere
performance of visuo-spatial sketchpad is disrupted by requiring concurrent visual or spatial activity that is inconsistent with image being maintained
the performance of short-term memory is dependent on the operation of phonological loop
the Baddeley/Hitch model assumes a verbal store & articulatory rehearsal process
the verbal store is assumed to hold speech-based information represented in traces that fade away over a period of 2 seconds
evidence on the nature of the verbal store comes from the phonological similarity effect & irrelevant speech effect
phonological similarity effect is that similar sounding items are harder to remember accurately than a dissimilar sequence
irrelevant speech effect is when a subject trying to remember sequence of visually presented #'s & performance is disrupted by presence of simultaneous irrelevant spoken material
the characteristics of articulatory control process is indicated by the word length effect & the effects of articulatory suppression
the word length effect is that memory span for long words is substantially smaller than the span for short words & memory span is linearly related to spoken duration
what are the effects of articulatory suppression? leads to irrelevant speech obliterates the word length effect if it occurs during both input & written recall interferes with phonological recording of visually presented materials
patients with defective STM performance show reduced memory span particularly with auditory presentation
patients who are dysarthria typically show normal phonological loop performance
dysarthric patients have lost the power to vocalize without disruption of higher-level language processes
what is the best understood component of working memory but its function unclear? the phonological loop
patients with a deficit in the phonological loop have problems with certain types of long/complex syntactic structures but no major deficit with straightforward sentential material
phonological loop is important for vocab acquisition
suppression disrupted operation of phonological loops leading to clear impairment of learning novel vocab words with little effect on acquisition of pairs of familiar words
the typical capacity of working memory is 7 +/- 2 items
in the Raven progressive matrix task you try to notice patterns about the matrix to identify what goes in the last box & while figuring it out you store info in working memory
Ravens performance predicts (correlates with) performance on a bunch of cognitive tasks & is often used as an IQ or intelligence test
the Ravens task suggests WM is important for any kind of higher-level thought
within working memory we distinguish between storage of info and executive processes
Ravens scores tend to be worse for older people
Ravens score is better if working memory is good
working memory task interferes with reasoning implying that you need working memory to do the reasoning task
anterograde amnesia is the inability to remember events occurring after brain injury
retrograde amnesia is the inability to remember events occurring before injury
retrograde amnesia that is temporary graded is when you can remember events that occurred during our childhood but you have an inability to remember events occurring before injury
double dissociations are evidence that two tasks or processes depend on different underlying cognitive systems
acoustic similarity shows that confusions occur if words sound alike but not for similar meaning or similar-looking words
subjects can generally remember about as many words as they can say in 2 seconds
chunking is when you group letters into meaningful chunks so that you can remember them better
the phonological loop is associated with Broca's & Wernicke's areas which are involved in spoken language
for right handed people language is processed in the left hemisphere
the 2 back task is when a subject is required to remember if they have seen a specific letter 2 letters back
we use the language areas in our brain to sub-vocally rehearse items in working memory
The Brooks experiment found that type of response interferes with the type of working memory if it is the same type
brain areas related to visuospatial working memory are the prefrontal cortex and occipital lobe
symptoms of frontal lobe syndrome which is caused by damage to the prefrontal cortex exhibit central executive dysfunction distractibility, difficulty concentrating, problems with organizing & planning & perseveration
Created by: kzegelien2005
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards