Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password

Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Term

McKinstry and Wang (1991)
click to flip
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't know

Term

McKinlay (1975)
Remaining cards (63)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Health Psych Studies

All key studies and example studies

TermDefinition
McKinstry and Wang (1991) Aim: To see if doctor’s clothing affected patients preference. Finding: Patients preferred formally dressed doctors. Jeans were least preffered. 64% though doctor’s clothing mattered.
McKinlay (1975) Aim: to learn how well lower working class mothers understand medical terms. Finding: Mothers more experienced with clinics understood terms better. Doctors underestimated patient understanding. Doctors used terms even when the patients did not understand
Savage & Armstrong (1990) summary Compared doctor-led (directing) and patient-led (sharing) styles. 200 patients saw one GP.
Savage & Armstrong (1990) context Doctor-centred: doctor leads, closed questions, patient passive. Patient-centred: patient involved, open questions, shared decisions. Study compares their impact on satisfaction.
Savage & Armstrong aim To compare how directing and sharing consultation styles affect patient satisfaction.
Savage & Armstrong sample 200 patients aged 16–75 from one doctor’s surgery over 4 months.
Savage & Armstrong procedure Patients were randomly assigned to a directing or sharing consultation style. The doctor used prompt cards to follow the chosen style. Consultations were recorded, and patients completed satisfaction questionnaires right after and one week later.
Savage & Armstrong findings Patients were more satisfied with the directing style. They felt the doctor understood them better, gave excellent explanations, and their condition improved more after one week.
Savage & Armstrong conclusions Doctor’s directing style leads to higher patient satisfaction, especially for simple physical problems, which goes against the common belief that a sharing style is better.
Savage & Armstrong strengths Validity, Reliability, Temporal validity, Application
Savage & Armstrong limitations Sample, Lack of qualitative data, Generalisability
Safer et al (1979) Safer et al. (1979) studied why people delay going to the doctor. They found delay happens in three steps: noticing illness, deciding to get help, and going for treatment. Pain made people act faster, but fear, cost, and life problems caused more delay.
Aleem & Ajarim (1995) A 22 year old woman had repeated abscesses and surgeries, evidence showed she caused the abcesses herself.
Laba et al (2012) Studied why people choose not to take medication, They found that side effects, cost, and dosage affected adherence, but symptom severity and alcohol restrictions did not. The cost was a factor only for those without private insurance
Riekert & Drotar (1999) Studied treatment adherence in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Non-returners tested their blood sugar less and had lower adherence scores than participants. The study suggested that better organization skills would benefit.
Chung & Naya (2000) It studied electronic monitoring of asthma medication adherence. Using TrackCap MEMS, they found 71% adherence and 89% compliance. The study showed TrackCap is a reliable adherence measure, despite some patients trying to manipulate results.
Chaney et al (2004) Studied whether a funhaler (a toy-like inhaler) could improve adherence in asthmatic children. 32 children used a standard inhaler for two weeks, then switched to the funhaler for two weeks. Results showed that adherence increased with the funhaler.
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) summary Tested different ways to encourage preschoolers’ immunizations. Monetary incentives worked best, followed by increased clinic access and specific prompts. General prompts were less effective, and control groups had the lowest rates.
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) context In the 1970s and 1980s, efforts to promote healthy behaviors like seatbelt use and good nutrition were increasing, but immunisation rates remained low in some areas. This posed health risks and led to school bans for unvaccinated children.
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) aim To test different community interventions to encourage preschool children’s immunisations, including prompts and incentives.
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) sample The sample consisted of 1,133 preschool children in need of at least one immunisation, drawn from a public health clinic in an American city.
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) procedure Families received either a general or specific prompt, increased clinic access, or a monetary incentive in the form of a cash lottery. Two control groups were included. They measured the number of children immunised, clinic attendance and total immunisati
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) findings The monetary incentive group had the highest immunisation rates, followed by increased access, specific prompts, and general prompts. These effects remained significant at two- and three-month follow-ups. Specific prompts were the most cost-effective, whi
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) conclusions Specific prompts and monetary incentives effectively increased immunisation rates, with incentives providing the biggest short-term boost but being less cost-effective long-term. These findings suggest that targeted reminders and accessible clinics can im
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) strengths The study had high population validity due to its large sample size and diverse participants. It used a longitudinal design, measuring both short-term and long-term effects, increasing validity. Accuracy checks ensure reliable data, and the findings have
Yokley & Glenwick (1984) limitations The study was conducted in a specific American city, limiting generalisability to other populations. While the monetary incentive was effective, it may not be sustainable or ethical in all healthcare settings. The reliance on mailed prompts assumes parent
MacLachlan et al (2004) Case study of Alan, a 32-year old amputee. He felt PLP in his amputated leg, feeling as though his toes were crossed and causing pins and needles. This was successfully treated with stretching exercises and mirror treatment.
Brudvik et al (2016) summary Children assess their pain as being more severe than parents do, and physicians assess it as even less severe than that. This leads to under-use of pain relief given by doctors.
Brudvik et al (2016) context Research by Grant (2006) suggested that children are often not given pain relief, such as analgesics, when they should be - especially in emergency care.
Brudvik et al (2016) aim To assess the level of agreement in pain severity between children, parents and physicians; to see if the child’s age and medical condition affects their pain assessment; and to see how these assessments affect the administration of pain relief for childr
Brudvik et al (2016) sample 243 children (aged 3-15 years, 53% male) who had attended a Norwegian emergency department over a 17-day period.
Brudvik et al (2016) procedure Children and parents were asked to rate the pain that the child was facing, using different techniques to make it age-appropriate. 3-8yrs used the FPS-R; 9-15 used the VAS; parents and physicians used the Numeric Rating Scale. Scores were compared.
Brudvik et al (2016) findings Doctor’s mean NRS = 3.2; Parents’ mean NRS = 4.8; Child’s mean score = 5.5. Though the difference in assessments decreased at higher pain severity. Only 14.3% of the children who assessed their pain as severe received painkillers.
Brudvik et al (2016) conclusions Physicians significantly underestimate pain in children, compared to parents and children. However, this was less likely in children aged 8+.
Brudvik et al (2016) strengths Good sample size; good ecological validity (real emergency department); use of quantitative data makes it more replicable
Brudvik et al (2016) limitations Use of self-report is vulnerable to demand characteristics and lying; Limited generalisability since it was one department in Norway
Chandola et al (2008) This is an example study that found the link between coronary heart disease and workplace stress with questionnaires and clinical examinations.
Wang et al (2005) The use of fMRI to measure CBF changes in response to mild to moderate stress as a result of a maths task.
Evans & Wener (2007) Use of salivary cortisol tests to measure stress who were found with crowding on a train.
Budzynski et al (1969) This study tested using an analogue monitor to measure muscle tension (in the forehead), testing to see whether biofeedback can work effectively for this and if yes, it would work for other muscle relaxation as well.
Bridge et al (1988) summary This study investigated the levels of stress after people receiving a cancer diagnosis due to the symptoms they could experience and the difficulty of the treatments. They tried to investigate to see if reducing stress through muscle relaxation helps thei
Bridge et al (1988) context Receiving a diagnosis of cancer can bring a lot of stress to the patient as they worry about the future, Bridge et al wanted to investigate how to reduce this as it is a dangerous add on.
Bridge et al (1988) aim To find out the effect of relaxation and imagery on stress experienced by cancer patients due to their diagnosis.
Bridge et al (1988) sample Included 139 women undergoing a six-week course of radiotherapy after being diagnosed with breast cancer. They were all under the age of 70 and attended a hospital in London, United Kingdom.
Bridge et al (1988) procedure Multiple self report questionnaires assessing their mood at the start, and then undergoing their programme based on their groups (control, relaxation, relaxation & imagery). Included deep breathing & sensory awareness. Duration of 6 weeks with questionnai
Bridge et al (1988) findings The most improvement was in the relaxation and imagery group, specifically towards the mood of the women. In the control group however, it had worsened.
Bridge et al (1988) conclusions The use of relaxation and imagery does help a lot for diagnosed cancer patients and their mood state.
Bridge et al (1988) strengths Use of self-report questionnaire; Lot of quantitative data due to scales; Application to everyday life as it can help to use relaxation and imagery techniques as a treatment in real life
Bridge et al (1988) limitations Good size of sample however all were women therefore lacks generalisability. Use of closed ended questions. Use of self-report questionnaire (bias through self reporting)
Janis & Feshbach (1953) Tested to see how different levels of fear in health messages affects behaviour (high school students heard talks about dental hygiene)
Lewin et al (1992) Tested if giving patients who experienced a heart attack, a self-help manual would help in recovery.
Tapper et al (2003) The use of 3 different methods to get 6 year old children to eat their fruits and vegetables per day. The methods used were taste exposure, modelling and reward system, to find out which one is most effective.
Fox et al (1987) They used a token economy to improve health and safety in open-pit mines by rewarding injury-free months with trading stamps, which workers could exchange for household items. The study found a significant reduction in lost-time injuries and associated co
Weinstein (1980) Investigated the effect of unrealistic optimism with 2 studies, to understand which factors affect this type of thought process.
Seligman Aimed to study positive psychology and the three happy lives. Taught students techniques like gratitude, savouring and using personal strengths to increase happiness.
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) summary It studied the impact of a school-based positive psychology program on adolescent mental health. They found that students who participated showed increased self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy, along with reduced distress, anxiety, and depression. The
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) context Studied a positive psychology program, to address rising adolescent mental health issues and improve well-being in schools, With research from Costello et al.(2004) and the WHO(2005 backing it up.
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) aim To see if a positive psychology intervention could improve adolencent’s well being.
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) sample 1,167 students aged 11-14 years from middle schools in Israel. One school was used as the intervention group and the other (matched for demographics) was the control group. Almost all participants were Jewish and from a mix of socioeconomic backgrounds.
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) procedure Teachers in the intervention group went through a 30-hour workshop, teaching them about positive psychology. They then taught the students this material using activities, discussions etc. Questionnaires (including the BSI and measures of self-esteem, self
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) findings Students in the intervention group had significant decreases in mental health symptoms, general distress, depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms and interpersonal sensitivity. They showed increases in self-esteem, self-efficacy and optimism. There was no d
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) conclusions Positive psychology programs can effectively promote adolescent well-being and improve the overall school environment.
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) strengths Use of a control group, Large sample, Longitudinal design, ecological validity.
Shoshani & Steinmetz (2014) limitations Limited sample, only uses self-report measures (demand characteristics), Possible cultural differences.
Created by: MrSamBlakeley
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards