All issues & debates terms
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
show | Exaggeration of differences between genders or cultures, usually presented as real and enduring, devaluing one gender or culture
🗑
|
||||
Beta bias | show 🗑
|
||||
Feminist psychology | show 🗑
|
||||
Indigenous psychologies | show 🗑
|
||||
Biological determinism | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Our experience of choice is merely the sum total of reinforcement contingencies from our life.
🗑
|
||||
Psychic determinism | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Completely disregards free will- everything is decided by biological and environmental factors
🗑
|
||||
show | Allows for the possibility of free will - we have inputs and influences but ultimately we get to choose
🗑
|
||||
Scientific determinism | show 🗑
|
||||
show | This is the scientific paradigm that suggests everything has a cause - meaning free will is incompatible with science
🗑
|
||||
show | Moral accountability for behaviour
🗑
|
||||
show | Innate and genetic influences
🗑
|
||||
show | Environmental influences acquired through interactions
🗑
|
||||
Diathesis-stress model | show 🗑
|
||||
Holism | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Simplifying an idea down into its constituent parts in order to explain it more easily.
🗑
|
||||
Levels of explanation | show 🗑
|
||||
Biological reductionism | show 🗑
|
||||
Environmental reductionism | show 🗑
|
||||
show | The assumption that all other conditions and variables in a study are the same from one condition to the next
🗑
|
||||
show | The whole is greater than the sum of its parts-- German 1920s+30s
🗑
|
||||
show | Attempts to describe the nature of the individual as unique entities with own subjective experiences motivations and values, without generalising to all
🗑
|
||||
Nomothetic approach | show 🗑
|
||||
show | A source of ethical problems. Just by studying a particular subject, such as racial differences in IQ could cause issues
🗑
|
||||
show | Research which could have a potentially negative impact on a particular group, e.g. defined by race, gender, sexuality etc.
🗑
|
||||
show | The ethical implications of your study for your participants - e.g. in revealing immoral or socially deviant behaviours
🗑
|
||||
Institutional context | show 🗑
|
||||
show | The way in which findings could be exploited by others for unethical purposes, such as to support racist or sexist prejudice
🗑
|
||||
show | Where psychologists only publish research that supports their aims, and hide away any negative results, creating a biased perception
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
SBlakeley
Popular Psychology sets