Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password

Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Lecture 13 & McClelland Reading

        Help!  

Question
Answer
show those that require a subject to produce/verify semantic info about an object, a depiction of an object, or a set of objects indicated verbally by a word  
🗑
show info that has not previously been associated with the particular stimulus object itself & which is not available more-or-less directly from perceptual input provided by the object/object description  
🗑
show a representation in memory corresponding to each of many concepts/categories & info about the concepts is either stored in the representations or is only accessible from it  
🗑
show access to relevant category representations  
🗑
show implicitly/explicitly at the base of theorizing about semantic knowledge & its use in semantic tasks  
🗑
show hierarchical structure, privilege categories, category prototypes  
🗑
hierarchical structure..   show
🗑
show info that is accessed directly & not by means of spreading activation in the processing hierarchy  
🗑
show the means of computing similarity between individual instances & stored category representations  
🗑
the 3 constructs used in categorization based theories offer   show
🗑
show such that exemplars of one category must also be members of another & these class inclusion constraints can be described by a taxonomic hierarchy  
🗑
show the observation that category membership at each level entails a # of properties that are shared by the members of the more specific included categories  
🗑
Quillian proposed a spreading activation mechanism that   show
🗑
show violate the predictions of the taxonomic hierarchy model  
🗑
show pattern of deficits in cases of progressing fluent aphasia or semantic dementia  
🗑
semantic dementia of fluent aphasia is   show
🗑
in semantic dementia what info is lost earlier in the progression of the disease?   show
🗑
studies by Cambridge group show that semantic dementia patients exhibit   show
🗑
the structure apparent in impair performance of semantic tasks reveals   show
🗑
show the first to be activated during access & the first to be acquired in development  
🗑
show describe children's ontological distinctions  
🗑
concepts on predictability trees occupy the same node if   show
🗑
the taxonomic structure is used to explain the   show
🗑
show the feature weights for more specific categorizations but the hypothesis doesn't explain why a given feature is important for some categories & not others or how the relevant knowledge was acquired in the 1st place  
🗑
illusory correlations are   show
🗑
studies show that people are not good at estimating   show
🗑
subjects persist in the belief that particular objects/properties have occurred together frequently even with   show
🗑
children in Massey & German's experiment are able to   show
🗑
show basic level of categorization  
🗑
subjects often perform best in semantic tasks requiring them to   show
🗑
show fastest to verify membership prefer to use the basic label in pic-naming tasks fastest to discriminate objects at the basic level show a larger effect of visual priming to basic level children first learn to name objects w/ their basic-level name  
🗑
show the cognitive system exploits representations that correspond to into-rich bundles of co-occurring attributes in the environment  
🗑
basic categories tend to have   show
🗑
Murphy & Lassaline describe basic categories as   show
🗑
show their exemplars have little in common  
🗑
show they have few distinguishing characteristics  
🗑
show share many properties with each other& few with contrasting categories & are considered to be particularly useful  
🗑
Rosch proposed that cognitive faculties develop to take advantage of the basic level structure by   show
🗑
show shared/distinctive properties as these are known within a particular culture  
🗑
show typical members but not atypical  
🗑
"basic level" concept representations constitute the   show
🗑
show only its basic category representation  
🗑
info stored at other levels of abstraction   show
🗑
privileged access theories introduce   show
🗑
basic-level phenomena are observed because   show
🗑
Jolicoeur et al. stipulated that entry-level categories don't need to   show
🗑
show increasing expertise in a domain which suggests that such effects are in part constrained by experience  
🗑
show subordinate level in their domain & novices prefer to name at basic-level  
🗑
experts in a given domain may derive somewhat different conceptions about how   show
🗑
the processes by which we construct semantic representations are sensitive to   show
🗑
show primacy over the most general level  
🗑
show family resemblances  
🗑
attributes have a tendency to   show
🗑
show forming summary representations of categories that correspond to clusters of correlated attributes in the environment  
🗑
show graded (some objects are better examples of categories than others)  
🗑
poor/atypical members of a category take longer to   show
🗑
show a prototypical set of descriptors that are generally, but not necessarily, true of the category's exemplars  
🗑
time taken to classify a given instances is inversely proportional to   show
🗑
show natural categories are represented by summary descriptions that are abstracted through exposure to instances in the environment  
🗑
novel instances are compared to stored summary descriptions & are assigned to   show
🗑
in prototypes theory the time taken to perform assignment depends upon   show
🗑
show data from lexical acquisition  
🗑
show a small # of properties relative to adult category prototypes  
🗑
category prototype representations may be used to explain   show
🗑
similarity-based models that attempt to do away with taxonomic processing structure will have difficulty explaining   show
🗑
show the strong influence of typicality on semantic judgements  
🗑
show the theory-theory approach  
🗑
basic tenet of theory-theory approach is that   show
🗑
it is difficult to characterize just what   show
🗑
show explain/predict observed events in the environment & it serves this function with reference to stored knowledge about the casual properties of & relations between objects  
🗑
in the TLC model a node inherits   show
🗑
the TLC model cannot account for   show
🗑
the original TLC model is hierarchical with all links the same length while the revised TLC model is   show
🗑
in the revised TLC model the length of the link corresponds to   show
🗑
show walking up the links to inherit the properties  
🗑
in the revised TLC model the properties are inherited by   show
🗑
being semantically primed means that   show
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Created by: kzegelien2005
Popular Psychology sets