Help
Options
Question
prefrontal lobotomy
click to flip
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't know
Question
Heuristics..
Remaining cards (62)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Psy100-OSU-RschMthds
Ch 2 Research methods (p. 63-96)
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| prefrontal lobotomy | surgical procedure that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobrs of re brain from underlying thalamus. |
| Heuristics.. | Mental shortcuts that help us to streamline our thinking and make sense of our world. |
| Representativeness heuristic | heuristic that involves judging the probibility of an event by its superficial similarity to a prototype (judging a book by its cover... using stereotypes, etc.) |
| base rate | how common a characteristic or behavior is in the general population. |
| availability heuristic | estimating the liklihood of an event by the ease at chich it comes to our minds |
| cognitive biases | systematic errors in thinking |
| hindsight bias | tendency to overestimate how well we could have successfully forecasted known outcomes |
| overconfidence | tendency to overestimate our ability to make correct predictions. |
| naturalistic observation | watching behavior in real-world settings |
| external validity | extent to which we can generalize findings to real world settings |
| naturalistic observation advantages | high degree of external validity |
| naturalistic observation disadvantages | low degree of internal validity, which is the extent to which we can draw cause&effect inferences. |
| internal validity | the extent to which we can draw cause & effect influences from a study |
| case study | research design that examines one person or a small number of people in depth, often for a long period of time |
| existance proofs | demonstrations that a given psychological phonomenon can occur. |
| adv of case study | helpful in existence proofs, can study rare phonomena |
| disadv of case study | depth is traded for breadth, low external validity (can be misleading and anecdotal) |
| correlational design | research design that determines the extent to which two variables are associated |
| correlational meanings (r=) | 0 = no association, 1 = positive association (same), -1 = negative association (inverted) |
| scatterplot | grouping of points on a 2d graph in which each dot represents a singer person's data |
| illusory correlation | perception of a statistical association between two variables when none exists |
| Experimental research design | design characterized by 1. random assignment of participants to conditions, and 2. manipulation of an independent variable |
| random ASSIGNMENT | randomly assigning participants to either control or experimental group |
| experimental group | group that recieves the manipulation |
| control group | group that doesn't recieve manipulation |
| independent variable | varaible that an experimenter manipulates |
| dependent variable | variable that experimenter measures to see whether the manipulation has an effect |
| confound | any difference between experimental and control groups (other than ind. variable) |
| Experiment & Causation Vs. Correlation | Experiments permit us to infer cause and effect relationships. |
| meta-analysis | investigation of the consistency of patterns of results across large numbers of studies from different laboratories |
| file drawer problem | tendency for negative findings not to be published |
| placebo effect | improvement from expectation of improvement |
| nocebo | harm from expectation of harm |
| blind | unaware whether one is in the control or experimental group |
| experimenter expectantcy effect | phonomenon in which researchers' hypothesis lead them to unintentionally bias a study outcome |
| double blind | neither experimenters nor participants know which group is control / experimental |
| hawthorne effect | participants knowledge that they're being studied affects their behavior |
| random SELECTION | every population member has equal chance of being selected to particpate |
| demand characteristics | cues that participants pic up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding its hypothesis. (type of hawthorne effect) |
| reliability | consistency of measurement |
| validity | extent to which a measure assesses what it claims to measure |
| reliability vs validity | a test must be reliable to be valid, but a reliable test can still be completely invalid. |
| self report measures | surveys, questionaires |
| advantages of self report measures | easy, direct to person |
| disadvantages | assumes people can be inaccurate, response sets |
| response sets | tendencies of research participants to distort their responses to questionaire items |
| halo effect | tendency of ratings of one positive characteristic to influence the ratings of other positive characteristics |
| horns effect | opposite of halo effect |
| leinency effect | tendency of raters to provide ratings that are overly generous |
| error of central tendency | an unwillingness to provide extreme ratings |
| ethical guidelines for human research | 1. review by an institutional review board 2. informed consent 3. justification of deception 4. debreifing |
| ethical issues in animal research | 1. use whenever humans cant be used. 2. any pain must be justified by expected benefits of human welfare |
| informed consent | informing research participants of what is involved in a study before asking them to participate |
| statistics | application of mathematics to describing and analyzing data |
| descriptive statistics | numerical categorizations that describe data |
| central tendency | measure of the "central" scores in a data set, or where the group tends to cluster |
| mean | average; a measure of central tendency |
| median | middle score in a data set, a measure of central tendency |
| mode | most frequent score in a data set, a measure of central tendency |
| dispersion | how loosely or tightly bunched scores are |
| range | difference between highest and lowest scores, a measure of dispersion |
| standard deviation | a measure of dispersion that takes into account how far each data point is from the mean |
| inferential statistics | mathematical methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalize findings from our sample to the full population |
Created by:
neill89
Popular Psychology sets