Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Ch 2 Research methods (p. 63-96)

        Help!  

Question
Answer
prefrontal lobotomy   surgical procedure that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobrs of re brain from underlying thalamus.  
🗑
Heuristics..   Mental shortcuts that help us to streamline our thinking and make sense of our world.  
🗑
Representativeness heuristic   heuristic that involves judging the probibility of an event by its superficial similarity to a prototype (judging a book by its cover... using stereotypes, etc.)  
🗑
base rate   how common a characteristic or behavior is in the general population.  
🗑
availability heuristic   estimating the liklihood of an event by the ease at chich it comes to our minds  
🗑
cognitive biases   systematic errors in thinking  
🗑
hindsight bias   tendency to overestimate how well we could have successfully forecasted known outcomes  
🗑
overconfidence   tendency to overestimate our ability to make correct predictions.  
🗑
naturalistic observation   watching behavior in real-world settings  
🗑
external validity   extent to which we can generalize findings to real world settings  
🗑
naturalistic observation advantages   high degree of external validity  
🗑
naturalistic observation disadvantages   low degree of internal validity, which is the extent to which we can draw cause&effect inferences.  
🗑
internal validity   the extent to which we can draw cause & effect influences from a study  
🗑
case study   research design that examines one person or a small number of people in depth, often for a long period of time  
🗑
existance proofs   demonstrations that a given psychological phonomenon can occur.  
🗑
adv of case study   helpful in existence proofs, can study rare phonomena  
🗑
disadv of case study   depth is traded for breadth, low external validity (can be misleading and anecdotal)  
🗑
correlational design   research design that determines the extent to which two variables are associated  
🗑
correlational meanings (r=)   0 = no association, 1 = positive association (same), -1 = negative association (inverted)  
🗑
scatterplot   grouping of points on a 2d graph in which each dot represents a singer person's data  
🗑
illusory correlation   perception of a statistical association between two variables when none exists  
🗑
Experimental research design   design characterized by 1. random assignment of participants to conditions, and 2. manipulation of an independent variable  
🗑
random ASSIGNMENT   randomly assigning participants to either control or experimental group  
🗑
experimental group   group that recieves the manipulation  
🗑
control group   group that doesn't recieve manipulation  
🗑
independent variable   varaible that an experimenter manipulates  
🗑
dependent variable   variable that experimenter measures to see whether the manipulation has an effect  
🗑
confound   any difference between experimental and control groups (other than ind. variable)  
🗑
Experiment & Causation Vs. Correlation   Experiments permit us to infer cause and effect relationships.  
🗑
meta-analysis   investigation of the consistency of patterns of results across large numbers of studies from different laboratories  
🗑
file drawer problem   tendency for negative findings not to be published  
🗑
placebo effect   improvement from expectation of improvement  
🗑
nocebo   harm from expectation of harm  
🗑
blind   unaware whether one is in the control or experimental group  
🗑
experimenter expectantcy effect   phonomenon in which researchers' hypothesis lead them to unintentionally bias a study outcome  
🗑
double blind   neither experimenters nor participants know which group is control / experimental  
🗑
hawthorne effect   participants knowledge that they're being studied affects their behavior  
🗑
random SELECTION   every population member has equal chance of being selected to particpate  
🗑
demand characteristics   cues that participants pic up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding its hypothesis. (type of hawthorne effect)  
🗑
reliability   consistency of measurement  
🗑
validity   extent to which a measure assesses what it claims to measure  
🗑
reliability vs validity   a test must be reliable to be valid, but a reliable test can still be completely invalid.  
🗑
self report measures   surveys, questionaires  
🗑
advantages of self report measures   easy, direct to person  
🗑
disadvantages   assumes people can be inaccurate, response sets  
🗑
response sets   tendencies of research participants to distort their responses to questionaire items  
🗑
halo effect   tendency of ratings of one positive characteristic to influence the ratings of other positive characteristics  
🗑
horns effect   opposite of halo effect  
🗑
leinency effect   tendency of raters to provide ratings that are overly generous  
🗑
error of central tendency   an unwillingness to provide extreme ratings  
🗑
ethical guidelines for human research   1. review by an institutional review board 2. informed consent 3. justification of deception 4. debreifing  
🗑
ethical issues in animal research   1. use whenever humans cant be used. 2. any pain must be justified by expected benefits of human welfare  
🗑
informed consent   informing research participants of what is involved in a study before asking them to participate  
🗑
statistics   application of mathematics to describing and analyzing data  
🗑
descriptive statistics   numerical categorizations that describe data  
🗑
central tendency   measure of the "central" scores in a data set, or where the group tends to cluster  
🗑
mean   average; a measure of central tendency  
🗑
median   middle score in a data set, a measure of central tendency  
🗑
mode   most frequent score in a data set, a measure of central tendency  
🗑
dispersion   how loosely or tightly bunched scores are  
🗑
range   difference between highest and lowest scores, a measure of dispersion  
🗑
standard deviation   a measure of dispersion that takes into account how far each data point is from the mean  
🗑
inferential statistics   mathematical methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalize findings from our sample to the full population  
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Created by: neill89
Popular Psychology sets