click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Congress 3
pgs. 344 (1), 368 (2-6), 370-1 (7-11)
Question | Answer |
---|---|
3.1 a) Explain the symbiotic relationship between PACs and candidates/officeholders. | Candidates need money, which they insist can be used without compromising their integrity; PACs want access to officeholders, which they insist can be gained without buying votes. |
3.1 b) Does PAC money go overwhelmingly to incumbents or challengers? | Incumbents |
3.1 c) What advantage does this provide the above (Does PAC money go overwhelmingly to incumbents or challengers)? | The funds provide incumbents with a major head start in fundraising, as congressional challengers typically have a hard time attracting PAC donations |
3.1 d) Why is "b" true? - can summarize | PAC contributions are basically investments for the future, and incumbents are the most likely to return the investment. |
3.2 a) What do incumbents have that most challengers lack? | High levels of recognition among their constituents and benefit less from campaign spending |
3.2 b) What role does money potentially play in the above (What do incumbents have that most challengers lack?)? | It matters how much their opponents spend (the candidate who spends the most usually wins) |
3.2 c) Who typically spends the most money? (see 2010 campaign) | The challengers are outspent by the incumbents especially in the House. In 2010 (H & S) the typical incumbent outspent the typical challenger by a ration of 2 to 1. |
3.3 a) What advantage does party identification give incumbents? | Most members of Congress represent constituencies in which their party is the clear majority. |
3.3 b) How have state legislatures helped the above (What advantage does party identification give incumbents?)? | They have employed advances in technology to draw the boundaries of House districts so that there is a safe majority for one party. |
3.4 When is there the greatest "likelihood of competition?" pg. 369 | When an incumbent is not running for reelection, and the seat is open. |
3.5 What are the term limits for members of the US Congress? box on bottom of pg. 369 | people want to restrict representatives to 6 or 12 years in office. |
3.6 a) Why does Congress tend to be "stable?" | Because incumbents usually win reelection |
3.6 b) What are the positive consequences of the above (Why does Congress tend to be "stable?")? | Allows representatives and senators to gain some expertise in dealing with complex questions of public policy |
3.6 c) What are the negative consequences of the above (Why does Congress tend to be "stable?")? | May insulate them from the winds of political change. Making it more difficult for citizens to "send a message to Washington" with their votes. |
3.7 Contrast the House and Senate in terms of centralization of power. | H - more centralized; strong leadership S - less centralized; weaker leadership |
3.8 a) The House is "more" what than the Senate? - provide 3 | More institutionalized (centralized, hierarchical, and disciplined) |
3.8 b) Why is the above (The House is "more" what than the Senate? - provide 3) true? | It is more than 4x as large as the Senate, and leaders in the House do more leading than do leaders in the Senate |
3.9 a) In what two ways is party discipline stronger in the House than in the Senate? | Party loyalty to leadership and party-line voting are common. |
3.9 b) What is true of first term members of the House as opposed to the Senate? | They are more likely than first-term senators to be just seen and not heard |
3.10 a) Define the Rules Committee. | The committee in the House of Representatives that reviews most bills coming from a House committee before they go to the full House. |
3.10 b) Which house of Congress is the Rules Committee unique to? | The House of Representatives |
3.11 a) When does a bill go to the Rules Committee? | When it is passed from a House committee |
3.11 b) What three things does it "give" a bill? | When it is scheduled ("rule") on the calendar, allotting time for a debate, and sometimes specifying what kind of amendments may be offered. |