click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Tummeltshammer et al
Infant Statistical Learners Exam
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Experimental Designs both experiments | Within subject 2x Reliability & 4x Stimulus (Boxes) |
Participants | 24x 8 month infants same for other, in both 20 were used approx split between M/F |
Apperatus | Eye tracking & 23" monitor, Tobii sw |
Stimuli (same for exp.2) but arrow instead | Face Cue (reliable / not) Smile "Look at this" Turn to box Animal sound 500ms Animal appears 3s |
Procedure - Reliable / Unreliable | Reliable: Always cues box where animals appear 1&2 Unreliable: 25% animals other to box 3 |
What was generalisation | The generalisation trials had a flash of all boxes to see get saccade this helped see what the infant predicted in absence of the reliability stimuli |
Toatl trials? | 20 reliable / 20 unreliable 4 test / 4 generalisation |
Results? Test Trials? | Repeated measures ANOVA Singificant effect for box Significant reliability x box interaction On trials with unreliable face, no effect of box, infants did not look sig longer at the cued box |
Results? Generalization Trials? | not significant but very close to could be the white flash but nothing provided so not keeping attention (think 6m other trials and their results). |