click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
line judgement task
Question | Answer |
---|---|
who when | 1951 Asch |
Aim | Asch wanted to investigate whether people would conform to the majority in situations where an answer was obvious |
Procedure ~ | 5-7 participants per group. was presented with a standard and 3 comparison lines. Participants had to say which line matched the standard line . only one real participant The confederates were told to give the incorrect answer 12 out of 18 trials |
Results | real participants conformed on 32% of the critical trials where confederates gave the wrong answers. Additionally, 75% of the sample conformed to the majority on at least 1 trial. |
Limitations. criticisms | • Lacks ecological validity as it was based on people’s perceptions of lines, this doesn’t reflect complexity of irl • Sampling issue: only carried out on men - gender bias. Cannot be applied to females. Lacks population validity |
Limitations. criticisms | • Ethical issues - mention deception - couldn’t give informed consent. May have felt embarrassed - psychological harm. Did debrief them |
Limitations. criticisms | • Some participants said they conformed to fit in with the group, this claim coincides ( supports) normative influence which says that people conform to fit in when privately disagreeing with the majority |
• Factors affecting conformity | In further trials, Asch changed the procedure (IV) to investigate situational factors influenced the level of conformity (DV). Group size , Group unanimity ,Normative influence, Informational social influence , Culture, Deindividuation, Social loafing |
• Group size | • altered the nnumber of confederates in his study to see how it affected conformity (IV) the bigger the majority group, the more people conformed but only up to a certain point |
• Group unanimity | • A person is more likely to conform when all members of the group agree and give the same answer - unanimous when group answer wasnt unanimous, conformity dropped. 1 confederate differ - 80% reduce conformity |
• Normative influence Change of behaviour is temporary | where a person conforms to fit in with a group because they don’t want to appear foolish or be left out. Normative social influence is usually associated with compliance, where a person changes heir public behaviour but not their private beliefs |
• Informational social influence • Fancy restaurant first time | where a person conforms because they have a desire to be right and look to others who they believe may have more information. This type of conformity occurs when a person is unsure of a situation or lacks knowledge and is associated with internalisation |
• Culture | • Cultures that are collectivist exhibit a higher degree of conformity than individualistic cultures. |
• Deindividuation | Deindividuation can become a powerful tool to trigger conformity; given that while deindividuated, subjects have a diminished perception of their personal traits, they will be likely to conform to the behaviours of the group. |
• Social loafing | the reduction of effort an individual puts in when they are part of a team doing the same job. this is linked to deindividuation because the individual knows that their level of effort is less likely to be monitored when they are part of a crowd |
group size results | 1 confederate, conformity 3% 2 confederates,13% 3+ confederates 32% Conformity didn’t increase much after the group size was about 4-5 Because conformity doesn’t seem to increase in groups larger than 4, this is considered the optimal group size |
Deindividuation vs group think | some distinguish by arguing that while deindividuation involves a loss of awareness, groupthink occurs when individuals actively shut down their individual thoughts in favour of the popular thoughts promoted by the group |
Conformity | is a type of social influence involving a change in belief or behaviour in order to fit in with a group |