click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Studies P&C
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Double-Blind Study Pro | - Eliminates experimenter bias in the results - Controls for placebo effect |
Double-Blind study Con | Results do not always reflect the real world |
Laboratory Study Pro | - Environment is controlled so no outside factors affect the study |
Laboratory Study Con | - The environment is too artificial, so results wont be the same in the real world. - The lab setting could also make the subject uncomfortable |
Field Study Pro | - Results reflect what would happen in the real world. The subject is in an environment where they are comfortable in |
Field Study Con | - Cant control for outside factors |
Survey Study Pro | - Allows for insight into thoughts, feelings, and opinions of the subject - The way a survey is completed doesn't matter (phone, person, etc.) |
Survey Study Con | - Many subjects ignore surveys sent through mail, TV, internet, phone - Subjects may lie about "bad" behavior |
Naturalistic Observation Study Pro | - Subject will behave normally because they don't know their being watched |
Naturalistic Observation Study Con | - Observer must make assumptions on what motivated behavior and could be wrong |
Interview study Pro | - Gives insight into subjects thoughts, feelings, and opinions - Ask more questions outside of list of questions to get more detail. |
Interview study Con | - Subject may lie about "bad" behavior - Questions may be biased. |
Case study Pro | - Experimenter is able to gather a lot of detailed information about one subject. |
Case study Con | - Results and information only apply to the one test subject; do not apply to the general public - Subject may lie about "bad" behavior. |
Psychological Test study Pro | - Tests cannot judge a subject based on their appearance - information Gaines in completely objective. |
Psychological Test Study Con | - Can only gain the information asked in questions - Cant predict what behavior will occur in the future - Tests cant tell why a behavior is being done. |
Longitudinal Study Pro | - Provides good information for developmental research (results tell us how people change over time) |
Longitudinal Study Con | - Very expensive - Very time consuming (takes as long as it takes subject to age) |
Cross-Sectional Study Pro | - Cheaper than longitudinal studies - Less time consuming than longitudinal studies - Represent the population at that time |
Cross-Sectional Study Con | - Cannot give results about changes over time. |