Cogsci Exam #3
Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in
each of the black spaces below before clicking
on it to display the answer.
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive psychology | show 🗑
|
||||
How language contribute to study of mind | show 🗑
|
||||
Mental representations → | show 🗑
|
||||
To understand the mind → | show 🗑
|
||||
Language “labels” | show 🗑
|
||||
show | provide insight into thinking, decision making, etc
🗑
|
||||
show | sentence strucuture
🗑
|
||||
show | meaning behind words
🗑
|
||||
show | Language is created by the mind → gets expressed → returns to the mind to be understood
🗑
|
||||
show | broken grammar/ speech
🗑
|
||||
show | word salad w/ no structure/ this relationship is broken/ mix up of words
🗑
|
||||
show | 1. Linguistics
2. Psycholinguistics
🗑
|
||||
Linguistics | show 🗑
|
||||
show | study of language as its learned + used
- Language → shared symbolic system for communication
- Language evolves/ always evolving
🗑
|
||||
Basic Units of Language (1) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Phonology= study of combination of phonemes in a language (how they can combine)
- EX: for “ough” → how many diff pronunciation (cough, through, tough, dough, ought, thought)
🗑
|
||||
show | Morpheme= smallest unit of meaning
🗑
|
||||
show | prefixes (re- means again) + suffixes (- ed means in the past) + articles (the) + conjunctions (and- connect words) + prepositions (of)
🗑
|
||||
Content morphemes | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Morphology= study of the combination of morphemes
- EX: talked (ed- past) (talk- content) → 2 morphemes
🗑
|
||||
Basic Units of Language (5) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Sentences= combination of phrases
- Combine sentences= paragraphs
- Combine paragraphs= book
- Combine books= triology
🗑
|
||||
Universal of Lang (1) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Semanticity= symbols become meaningful through use
🗑
|
||||
Universal of Lang (3) | show 🗑
|
||||
Prescriptive rules | show 🗑
|
||||
show | governing actual language use → psycholinguist
🗑
|
||||
Generative | show 🗑
|
||||
show | used to communicate/ share thoughts/ ideas (mental representations)
→ Language provides the labels of these mental representations
🗑
|
||||
show | Learning a language → acquiring a set of behavioral dispositions (set of ways to behave) --> through OC
🗑
|
||||
Chomsky | show 🗑
|
||||
show | don’t need a stimulus (can say whatever pops into your head) → independent of the stimulus asked
🗑
|
||||
Language is historically unbound | show 🗑
|
||||
Linguistic behaviors cannot be controlled | show 🗑
|
||||
Language module= | show 🗑
|
||||
Innate knowledge of grammar | show 🗑
|
||||
H1 (hypothesis) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | find the first occurrence of is following NP (noun phrase) and move it to the front
🗑
|
||||
Arguments for Language Innateness 1 | show 🗑
|
||||
Arguments for Language Innateness 2 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | simply learned/ induce by listening/ exposed to language all the time without being taught
🗑
|
||||
show | Uniformity
- Children acquire language through the SAME stages at approx. the SAME time → must be innately determined
🗑
|
||||
Arguments for Language Innateness 4 | show 🗑
|
||||
Arguments for Language Innateness 5 | show 🗑
|
||||
Arguments for Language Innateness 6 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Against “language universals” → too diverse; 5000-8000 languages
- Universals cannot be independent of human culture → many cultures have diff labels for things (too diverse)
🗑
|
||||
show | Against “poverty of stimuli proposal”
- Considerable evidence parents DO provide constant feedback → may not explicitly say why, but extract rules implicitly + extract those rules on one’s own
🗑
|
||||
show | Against “innateness” of UG through genes/ natural selection
- Too short a time frame → evolution is slow process for enviro to select things for species to move forward
🗑
|
||||
show | formal study of meaning of words, sentences, higher level discourse
🗑
|
||||
show | try to define meaning, find self running in a circle
- EX: Meaning: something that is signified
🗑
|
||||
show | Symbols that are inherently empty
🗑
|
||||
show | Words mean diff things in various complex contexts
- EX: the diamond cut the glass (sharp) vs. the diamond reflected the sun (shiny)
🗑
|
||||
show | Currently no good theory of grammar= no good theory of semantics
- EX: The cop raised his hand, and the car stopped
🗑
|
||||
Language & Thoughts | show 🗑
|
||||
show | is a single product of thinking
--> conceived in the mind
🗑
|
||||
Lexicalizaed | show 🗑
|
||||
show | words can be stringed together by grammar (conjugation of the verb)
🗑
|
||||
Eventdentially | show 🗑
|
||||
Mentalese | show 🗑
|
||||
Language FORMS ideas | show 🗑
|
||||
Lingusitic Relativity Hypothesis (Sapir Whorf Hypothesis) | show 🗑
|
||||
Weaker form (1) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | → language determines our perception of the world/ the language limits this perception (determine perception of the world)
→ language determines reality
🗑
|
||||
show | linguistic relativity
→ language does NOT determine reality → OBJECTIVE reality exists
→ language only shapes/ influences how we perceive the world
🗑
|
||||
show | (Sapir)- proposes that language only influences thoughts/ perception of reality
🗑
|
||||
Stronger form (2) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | language determines thoughts/ will determine reality
🗑
|
||||
Perception | show 🗑
|
||||
Field of sensation + perception | show 🗑
|
||||
show | 1. Don’t see things that are THERE
2. See things are NOT there
3. See things that are IMPOSSIBLE or CANNOT BE
4. See things that are AMBIGUOUS
🗑
|
||||
show | a basic property of an object
🗑
|
||||
Analysis of features | show 🗑
|
||||
Visual Segregation | show 🗑
|
||||
Gestalt psychology | show 🗑
|
||||
Extracting Depth for 3D Representation of World | show 🗑
|
||||
show | (sensation of) eye converging on an object
🗑
|
||||
show | External image falls on doff parts of the retina
Creating different retinal images; superimposed in the occipital lobe
🗑
|
||||
show | closer objects blocks out farther object
🗑
|
||||
show | parallel lines appear to converge in distance
🗑
|
||||
show | roughness of a surface; closer surface stands out
🗑
|
||||
Object Recognition | show 🗑
|
||||
Geons have 3 properties | show 🗑
|
||||
show | can always tell one geon from another
🗑
|
||||
show | can be identified from different angles/ rotation
🗑
|
||||
show | can be identified when incomplete
- Visual noise= picture may not be finished, but can still be recognized
🗑
|
||||
Face Recognition (2 systems) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | specalizing in the recognition if an object’s parts (features/ geons) (eyes, nose, ears, eyebrows → no problem recognizing)
🗑
|
||||
Holistic configurational system | show 🗑
|
||||
show | The fusaform face area of temporal lobe
More difficult to detect feature when upside down
🗑
|
||||
Bottom-up processing | show 🗑
|
||||
Top-down processing | show 🗑
|
||||
show | process of perceiving basic shape/ size of an object
🗑
|
||||
Object recognition | show 🗑
|
||||
show | inability to reach out/ grab objects
- Damage to parietal lobe
🗑
|
||||
show | inability to perceive motion
- Series of snapshots
- Damage to temporal-parietal cortices
🗑
|
||||
Agnosia | show 🗑
|
||||
show | inability to recognize faces
- Can recognize objects
- Damage to fusaform face area of temporal lobe
🗑
|
||||
Neglect syndrome | show 🗑
|
||||
Illusions | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Concentration of mental effort on sensory events (from environment) + mental events
🗑
|
||||
Complex tasks | show 🗑
|
||||
Selective Attention | show 🗑
|
||||
show | the failure to notice a fully visible stimulus right in the visual scene
- Primary task captures your attention → another OBVIOUS object is NOT noticed
🗑
|
||||
Change blindness | show 🗑
|
||||
Auvray & O'Regan (2003) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Gorilla + basketball video- 15 passes/ gorilla passes by through circle
- 50% subjects missed gorilla
--> inattention blindness
🗑
|
||||
show | Monkey business- 16 passes (white + black shirts), gorilla passes through, curtains change color, player leaves
--> inattention blindness
--> lower % when expecting gorilla to see anything else
🗑
|
||||
show | Who-dun-it (21 things changed)
--> change blindess
🗑
|
||||
show | finite “pool” of attention → focuses across all things/ use attention for multiple things
🗑
|
||||
Attention is distributed across different activities | show 🗑
|
||||
show | 1. Available capacity
2. Allocation policy
3. Enduring dispositions
4. Momentary intentions
5. Possible Activities
6. Evaluation of demands on capacity
🗑
|
||||
show | pool of available attention
- Filled by level of arousal → physiological activation
- moderate arousal= best → too low (tired) or too high (anxious)
🗑
|
||||
show | affect capacity → feed into it or decrease it
- EX: enough sleep= increase attention, not enough sleep= decrease attention
🗑
|
||||
Miscellaneous manifestations | show 🗑
|
||||
Allocation Policy | show 🗑
|
||||
show | automatic influences requiring attention
- Something captures your attention instantly/ can’t ignore it
- EX: sudden movement or new event
🗑
|
||||
show | conscious decision to attend to something
- Specific goal(s) of the moment --> it is an impulse that pops in
🗑
|
||||
Possible Activities | show 🗑
|
||||
Evaluation of Demands on Capacity | show 🗑
|
||||
Memory | show 🗑
|
||||
3 memory processes | show 🗑
|
||||
Encoding | show 🗑
|
||||
Storage | show 🗑
|
||||
Capacity | show 🗑
|
||||
Duration | show 🗑
|
||||
show | formed of stored memory
🗑
|
||||
show | getting information out
🗑
|
||||
show | Proposed that there are 3 memory sub-systems that are arranged in stages
Also known as a mulit-store model
Uses information process approach
🗑
|
||||
show | associated w/ visual system
- duration= 0.5-1 sec
🗑
|
||||
Echoic memory | show 🗑
|
||||
show | competition of past vs. current information
🗑
|
||||
show | current info what is being learned now interfers with what have been learned in the past
🗑
|
||||
proactive interference | show 🗑
|
||||
AVOID interferences (spacing effect) | show 🗑
|
||||
show | info in LTM is there
🗑
|
||||
show | can you get it
🗑
|
||||
show | a reminder of the info (words, images, objects, situations)
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
lils33
Popular Psychology sets